Thursday, 3. March 2011
At this point it was easy to see that Mexico 70 was shaping up to be a very good world cup with truly wonderful displays of football. This despite scoring not being any where near as high as it had been in Switzerland 54; it was still a tournament which was bringing back some of the lost quality from previous world cups. Brazil for its next match played against Peru, who was being led by players the likes of Cubillas, Gallardo, Chale and Sotil.
Cubillas, in fact having already scored four goals in the competition and a player who would go on to become the first and so far only midfielder to score ten goals or more in world cup history with only two being from the penalty spot. This while Sotil was the sort of player whose dribbling managed to set up goals for other players. The game looked to be an interesting one. As it presented two South American teams with very good attacking players yet not much in the way of defense along with goalkeepers who did not really provide all that much security. I, for my part have wondered how Peru would have done had they had Ramon Quiroga back in Mexico 70. Quiroga being an Argentine goalkeeper who took Peruvian citizenship and even managed to save a penalty for them against Scotland in Argentina 78. This being only speculation of course yet I do find it interesting.
Peru however had one big flaw and this being that they tended to start very slowly which had put them deep in a whole early in two of their first three matches. Peru having fallen behind by 2-0 to Bulgaria only to come back to win by 3-2 yet could not manage a similar come back against Germany; who took a 3-0 lead. It being Cubillas, who on that occasion scored Peru’s only goal against Germany, whose three goals came courtesy of Gerhard Muller. As a footnote, I would like to point out that Muller and Cubillas went on to become teammates in the Fort Lauderdale Strikers of the now bankrupt NASL of the 70s and early 80s but that like they say is another story.
In this game, it was not so much that Brazil got off to such a great start but more that Peru’s defense gave away too many advantages early by making too many mistakes. It being thanks to a big error by defender Campos that Rivelihno was able to score for Brazil just 11 minutes in to the match to give Brazil a 1-0 lead. Brazil would then only have to wait four minutes before Tostao thanks to a bad goalkeeping mistake by Rubinos increased his team’s lead to 2-0. Peru was down but had not much to their credit, conceded defeat or at least not just yet. It being a tremendous shot by Gallardo from a seemingly impossible angle which put them on the score board and within striking distance of Brazil at 2-1.
Brazil would score another goal when a pass by Pele was deflected off a Peruvian defender on to the oncoming Tostao who got his second of the game as well as of the tournament to give Brazil a 3-1 lead. Peru found themselves down by two goals one more time yet again did not desist from trying. It in fact being Sotil who set up Cubillas for his fifth goal of the tournament as well as the one which once again put Peru within striking distance at 2-3. It being as if Peru simply refused to be put away.
Brazil however would go on to get a fourth when Jairzinho scored his fifth of the tournament to keep his record in tact of having scored in each of his country’s matches. Brazil won the game by 4-2 in what truly was a lovely display of football by both teams and though Peru was eliminated; they did leave good memories of their football. Peru also becoming the first team in the history of the world cup to win “The Fair Play” trophy.
Brazil had made it through to the semifinal to face a Uruguayan team which even threatened to leave the tournament when they were told they would have to play Brazil in Guadalajara. This being where Brazil had played all of its world cup matches up and till that point. Uruguay eventually accepted to play the game in Guadalajara’s Jalisco Stadium yet not without protests.
Uruguay got off to a good start when Cubilla put them in the lead 19 minutes in to the match yet were to a certain extent unlucky when Clodoaldo scored for Brazil to level matters at 1 a piece with just 1 minute left in the half. Brazil and Uruguay were tied at half time yet it was clear that Brazil was the fresher of these two teams as Uruguay had been taken in to overtime by the Soviet Union while Brazil managed to win their quarterfinal match in regulation time. The second half would see Brazil score two goals. The first of which came courtesy of Jairzinho (76 minutes) while the second one came with one minute left in the game which pretty much booked Brazil’s passage in to the finals and their third one in four world cups. Pele however had time for one last play which is another one for which he is mostly remembered for though he did not score. It being one in which he lets the ball go by Uruguayan goalkeeper Mazurkiewicz to pick it up on the other side only to miss a shot on an open goal. This play being one which for some reason still lives in the memory of many, though I personally see nothing about it to even compare it to some of the plays Maradona would perform just 16 years later in another world cup organized in Mexico. Of course also taking in to consideration that after Rivelinho’s goal, Uruguay was what could be hailed as a defeated team which was all too aware that the final was simply a game they were not going to be playing in or at least not in this world cup.
Brazil would be playing against Italy in the final. It being Italy who in a historic marathon of a seesaw match had managed to beat Germany by a score of 4-3 to make it to the final. Italy having a wonderful team that year which in 1968 had won the European Cup. This Italian team boasting a list of stars such as Riva, Rivera, Fachetti, Albertosi, Boninsegna and Mazzola. Looking back one could say that Italy was one of the few really good teams which Brazil played in their last four world cups along with Portugal and Hungary in 66 or perhaps France in 58 yet Italy was also a very tired outfit. Specially after their game against Germany took so much out of them. It being their trainer who even claimed that many of its players were urinating blood after the match.
Brazil, for its part was not short of great players yet to most of the public, their most recognizable player was still Pele. It being he who justly or perhaps not, was their only player who had already won the world cup and though he really did not play in 62; many accredited him with having won two titles. Brazil after all had new players on their team, none of which with the sole exception of Pele had been playing for Brazil when they won the world cup in 58 and 62. This making Pele, the symbol of this Brazilian team or at least to much of the public who were seeing him playing in his fourth world cup while players like Jairzinho, Tostao, and Rivelinho were just making their mark in the world cup.
Italy however despite the fatigue made a match of it as far as the first half was concerned. It being the first half which ended in a score of 1-1 with Brazil’s only goal coming courtesy of a Pele header while Italy’s goal came thanks to Boninsegna, who took advantage of a mix up between Felix and his defenders. Pele’s goal also coming due to a mix up in the Italian team. It being Italy’s coach who had sent Bertini to mark Pele yet realized that perhaps using a creative player to mark Pele one on one was a waste of good offensive player. This prompting his decision to change the man who would be marking Pele from Bertini to Rosato yet just as Italy was in the middle of doing this; Brazil had a throw in. It being Rivelinho, who got the ball which he immediately centered to a still unmarked Pele who had no trouble in beating his marker; who had yet to get to where he could cover him.
The second half saw the results of Italian fatigue as those were still not the days of such great conditioning by players and teams which could play a match which went 120 minutes to come back a few days later as if they had only played 90 minutes. This being what Italy did in 2006, where after having beaten Germany in a semifinal which went 120 minutes were able to come back a few days later and beat France in the final. This in another match which would go in to overtime and subsequently in to penalty kicks.
Brazil went on to score three goals in the second half and win the match by a convincing 4-1 score yet the truth was that Italy did not have the strength to play in the second half. Of course, in this I do not wish it to be understood that I believe Italy would have won the game had they not been so tired from their previous match yet it undoubtedly would have been harder for Brazil.
As for Brazil’s goals in the second half, they were scored by Gerson, Jairzinho and Carlos Alberto in that precise order. It is this last goal by Carlos Alberto which saw 8 Brazilian players touch the ball before it ended up in the net but the truth was that at that stage, Italy knew full well that the match was over or at least the competitive part of it. It being a similar situation when Petite scored for France against Brazil several years later when France was already winning by 2-0 with time running out and Brazil having fully realized that they simply were not going to win.
With this win Brazil became world champion for the third time and what was more impressive is that they had won 3 out of 4 world cups. Naturally Pele having been on all those teams yet it is my opinion that Brazil would have won those world cups even if Pele had not been on their team. As such was the strength of their players and teams in those days and also the weakness of the other teams. I also wish to make it clear in this that I am not saying by any stretch of the imagination that Brazil won despite having Pele on their team yet I feel that Brazil still would have been world champion in 70 and 58 even if Pele had not played. As the truth was that they basically won without him in 62. All of this in contrast to Maradona, without whom I am almost certain Argentina would not have won the title in Mexico 86 or even reached the final in Italia 90.
Pele would retire from the world cup competition after Mexico 70 and eventually from football in 77. This after a few years with the New York Cosmos where in a very weak league and despite his 30 years plus; was able to score many goals. Pele after retirement took to commentating matches and basically putting down anybody who was even compared him. Pele going to the extreme of trying to hurt Zico’s career in the early 80s when some were starting to call him the white Pele.
Pele however become specially hostile toward Maradona. This after having received him as a friend in the start of their relationship yet changed his attitude when some were claiming that Maradona was in fact even better than he had been. This a statement made not by Maradona, himself but by such greats of the game as Alfredo Di Stefano and others. I, for my part particularly remember some remarks made by Pele concerning Maradona after Spain 82 in which he claimed that all Maradona was capable of was falling on the ground and crying about being fouled. I, thinking to myself at the time and this from the man who said he would never play in a world cup at the age of 25 when he was fouled once or twice in a match against Portugal in which in all truth he really did not play that well in.
Pele would also claim after the 86 world cup that he was considering coming back to football because Brazil needed him. It being this particular comment which led to Maradona suggesting to Pele that perhaps it was psychiatric assistance that which he should seek instead of a new start in football at the age of 46. It even being Brazil’s coach Parreira, who before winning the world cup in USA 94; claimed that he wanted no interference from Pele and even banned him from having contact with the players.
In my opinion, Pele was a great player yet nowhere near as good as he is generally believed to have been by those who only look at the statistics and not the stories behind them. Pele in a way being like France’s Zidane, who managed to score two goals in a final of a world cup in which he did little else yet is for the most part considered one of the best players of all time.
In conclusion, I would say that in the word’s of Shakespeare “some are born great, some achieve greatness and some have it entrust upon them”. Pele’s case being one of having been born great as well as having achieved greatness but mostly from having had it entrust upon him. This by being at the right place in history and on the right teams which could make him seem even better than he really was. Pele to a large extent being like Mohamed Ali, Maria Callas, Zidane, Alexander (the great), Pope John Paul II, Shakespeare, Michael Jackson, Lawrence Olivier, Franklyn Roosevelt, J.F. Kennedy, Nelson Mandela, Gandhi, Martin Luther King Junior along with many others; whom I feel are also praised beyond the true value of their achievements.